Skip to main content

SERP Position Forecasting Indicator

Potential trending using the "Position in search results" statistics

Recently in the last 2 days our website Danols Web Engineering has achieved 3rd position for "kingston web design" keyword phrase so I have been waiting for my SERP (I finally learned what that stands for!) to stabilize.

Reviewing the Google Webmaster tool reports I noticed that the sister phrase "web design kingston" in Google Webmaster tools had a few impressions from the 6-10 spot; the site ranks 13th. Intrigued by this I kept reducing the time range untill I got this:

Now Google sorts the above statistic by impression column hence even though they are not showing the exact number (nothing stopping them from doing so) I can conclude that the 6-10 has the most impression.

Thinking out loud here this means two things to me, well maybe three:

  1. Google is testing a new algorithm and a small percent of people are seeing the site ranking higher.
  2. Google is testing the sites quality by placing it higher in results and analyzing visit pattern to the site.
  3. Google is ranking my site higher but I am hitting a search data cluster that hasn't updated yet.

Now 1, 2 seem unlikely from the sheer fact that these tests are performed on miniscule percentage of search volume and the keyword phrase has a low search volume which would make statistical testing hard - hence me thinks it's number 3 or some 4 option that would mean the rank is to rise!

If this pans out perhaps then one could daily pull the 'Position in search results' statistics and with some confidence predict if a site would drop or raise. This would obviously be hindered because exact data is obscured by Google.

And with the last statement we might also have a reason why Google is obscuring that data - knowing it exactly would allow for clear direct tracking of what works and what doesn't in the SEO world.

As teaser below is a screen shot summarizing legendary raise of Danols Web Engineering site from obscurity to front page. I do look forward to completing a post on that as I kept the journey and progress very scientific.

Comments

  1. I believe the above to be accurate as the site is currently SERP 8th for web design kingston: www.google.ca/search?q=web+design+kingston.

    Furthermore I noticed a similar pattern for FIRST position and keyword 'Kingston web design' which is very exciting! - currently the rank is 2nd for 'Kingston web design' and time will tell.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Opera SOCKS Proxy Setup Issues

SOCKS error: Connection closed by remote server When setting up SOCKS only proxy in Opera web browser make sure to specify the IP address instead of your fully qualified domain name (FQDN). Using a host name will not work and Opera simply fails to connect to the proxy server. Sample working setup screen shot with a Dante proxy server , note that HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, SSH options are left blank. Bug DSK-364301 has been filled with Opera, if it has been a while since this post and the issue still not fixed feel free to add your word of encouragement by emailing DSK-364301@bugs.opera.com :)

Storing passwords in PuTTY

How to save SSH username/password for auto login in PuTTy The answer is you can't do it...at least in plain PuTTy. However there is an awesome fork with that let's you store the username and password and other additional features called KiTTy.



So grab yourself a copy and +1 this if you do, thanks.

Duplicate value found: duplicates value on record with id: <unknown>.

System.DmlException: Insert failed. First exception on row 0; first error: DUPLICATE_VALUE, duplicate value found: <unknown> duplicates value on record with id: <unknown>.The above error is triggered in the database layer and caused by a trigger or workflow outside of your main code of block that is bubbling this exception. This is rather difficult to track down especially if you are unfamiliar with the code, I am sharing my procedure in the hopes this saves you time - if you find this helpful drop me a line or follow me on twitter @danielsokolows. This error is caused by unique field constraint on the object, so the first step is to examine the object and locate the API names of all unique fieds. You can do this through SF direclty 'Setup < Customize &lt <object being inserted> &lt Fields' or by downloading the `src/objects` metadata information and searching for <unique>; I preffer the latter and actually download ALL matadata information f…